Pueblog USa
Thursday, April 02, 2009
ISSUES- ISSUES- ISSUES
Transparency, oversight, bidding procedures
Issues- Issues- Issues
January 28, 2009
I am concerned about the honor farm deal with NEK that is being considered without competitive bidding. There are those that say NEK is willing to invest their own money to make improvements. That may be true. But it must be remembered that NEK is a for profit company and their motive, most likely, for making improvements is not for the benefit of the community but for their ability to increase profits.
Might there be better qualified companies/organizations interested in operating the honor farm facilities and are willing to invest in making improvements. We may never know, because the city was not and continues not to be willing to go out on bid for the operations of the facilities. Secret negotiations generally seem to be the preferred way of doing business.
It is my understanding NEK has been using the honor farm facilities for some period of time for training (a profitable service). I would like to know how long NEK has used the facility and how much they have paid the city prior to the July, 2008 agreement and since that agreement.
This brings up the problem of little or no oversight of non-departmental operations. I believe the proposed change of the city management hierarchy, which I believe is a step in the right direction, must include well defined oversight of these operations. The honor farm/PMI situation is an example.
There is also another example, the fixed base operations at the airport. Recently the city issued a RFP, possibly for the second time, for the fixed base operations. I reviewed the RFP and came to the conclusion that the requirements to update and maintain the operations at the expected high level requested versus the risks and cost for an operator did not make good business sense for any potential bidder.
I attended to the bid opening, I was the only one that did, and it was no surprise to me that only one bid was submitted. This was from a company that was incorporated in November of 2008. This kind of situation seems to happen on a too frequent basis. Why? Is it lack of long term planning, and oversight, or is the city hard to do business with. The people need answers on how the city can provide a more efficient and cost effective government.
Ted Freeman
Next entry: Now That You Mention It — 090810 Previous entry: City Council-City Manager or City Council-Mayor
-
Well, We won the first round. NEK and the two council members who carried their agenda has, at least, lost the first big battle. I have to compliment Vera Ortegon, Judy Weaver, Ray Aguilera, and Larry Autencio for going the extra mile and learning a little more about Pueblo Motorsports Park than they had been told by those who presented a closed agenda.
How they handle the management and financial responsibilities after NEK is yet to be seen, but I do believe they will look a little farther before they leap . .
Incidentally, here is a copy of an eMail I received from Jay Gilman (Former Track and Operations manager@ PMP) regarding a statement made by Councilman Mike Ochiatto to the Pueblo Chieftain claiming to have never seeing anything regarding financial statements or fiduciary Operations at Pueblo Motorsports Park . .
Quote:
Occhiato is wrong…...again…. We made a report to the city manager every year, what he did with it I don’t know. Also one year we made upa real nice presentation book with financials, attendance, etc and gave one to each council member. Bob Schilling was on council at the time. Occhiato handed his back. Also the revenue from daily track rentals was WAY more than NEK ever paid but NEK has driven that off. As for their “million dollars”, once again, PMI invested at least $100,000 a year for the past 5 years. We haven’t had ANY support from the city since the early 90’s, so yes it can and was, self sustaining without city help. Yes you may give Vera this information.
Unquote
This also brings up another question . . What did Dave Galli do with these documents? And why were they, apparently, deep sixed . . .
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 05/11 at 09:53 AM -
Nigeria is the largest oil producer in Africa and the eleventh largest producer of crude oil in the world. In 2006, total Nigerian oil production averaged 2.45 million barrels per day. Nigeria had 36.2 billion barrels in proven oil reserves as of January 2007. testking E20-522 1 Nigeria’s leaders have accomplished several important economic reforms since 2000, when new anti-corruption measures were put in place. One of the greatest achievements of former president Olusegon Obasanjo was the opening of oil and gas revenues to greater scrutiny through implementation of the EITI. Since 2003, unprecedented amounts of revenue information have been brought into the public domain. The Nigerian economy is heavily dependent on the oil and gas sector, which accounts for 99% percent of export revenues, 85% of government revenues, and about 52% of gross domestic product (GDP)2. Despite total earnings of over $400 billion USD in oil revenue since the early 1970s, Nigeria’s GDP per capita is only about $1,049 (2007), and the vast majority of its 140 million citizens have seen little benefit from this legacy of wealth. Nigeria ranks 159th out of 177 on the UN Human Development Index. The democratic transition begun in 1999 has increased protection for civil and political liberties, but it has yet to yield tangible improvements in the standard of living for average Nigerians. More than one third of the population lives in extreme poverty—defined by the World Bank as earnings of under $1 per day—while 9 out of 10 Nigerians live on under $2 per day3. testking EC0-350 Most people lack access to basic services such as clean water, electricity, and health care.
testking 70-536 on 08/06 at 04:52 AM